Eskwai logo
Verify now as a student, judge or newly called lawyer for access to discounted plans.

Secretary of State for Business Enterprise & Regulatory Reform v Amway (UK) Ltd

May 14, 2008

CHANCERY DIVISION

United Kingdom

CORAM

  • Mr Justice Norris

Areas of Law

  • Corporate Law
  • Commercial Law
  • Administrative Law

AI Generated Summary

The Secretary of State for Trade and Industry petitioned to wind up Amway (UK) Ltd under Insolvency Act 1986 section 124A, alleging the business was inherently objectionable, an unlawful lottery, and an unlawful trading scheme under the Fair Trading Act 1973. Mr Justice Norris examined Amways multilevel marketing model, including the role of Business Support Material promoted by senior IBOs through Britt (UK) Ltd and Network 21, and statistical evidence showing that most IBOs earned little or no bonuses while a small fraction earned substantial amounts. He found Amways own materials narrowly complied with required warnings, but IBO organisations materials and presentations frequently made misleading income claims, and Amway had failed to effectively enforce its policies, allowing a penumbra of impropriety from which it benefited. In October 2007 Amway implemented significant reforms: a retail-focused structure, elimination of registration and renewal fees, mandatory certification and induction, and centralised, non-profit BSM. Concluding the revised scheme was not a lottery and did not breach s120(3), the court declined to order winding up and would dismiss the petition upon undertakings, including income disclosure and an induction programme.