Eskwai logo
Verify now as a student, judge or newly called lawyer for access to discounted plans.

Dart & Ors v R

2014

COURT OF APPEAL (CRIMINAL DIVISION)

United Kingdom

CORAM

  • LORD JUSTICE PITCHFORD
  • MR JUSTICE SWEENEY

Areas of Law

  • Criminal Law and Procedure
  • Evidence Law

AI Generated Summary

This Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) judgment, delivered by Mr Justice Sweeney with Lord Justice Pitchford concurring, addresses two unlinked sets of defendants who pleaded guilty to engaging in conduct in preparation for acts of terrorism under section 5 of the Terrorism Act 2006. In the London case, Richard Dart and Jehangir Alom twice sought terrorist training in Pakistan to fight coalition forces in Afghanistan, coordinating with Imran Mahmood and using covert silent messaging; they were stopped from flying on 11 November 2011. In the Luton case, Zahid Iqbal facilitated Mohammed Ahmeds March 2011 trip to Pakistan, funded and arranged contacts, and planned his own trip; Arshad and Hussain assisted with training and downloads of Inspire while discussing IEDs and firearms. The Court declined to issue general sentencing guidance for section 5, reaffirmed starting from the notional completed offence and assessing the nexus of preparation to intended acts, and upheld extended sentences and 15-year notional terms for Iqbal and Ahmed while refusing Darts appeal. It allowed Arshads and Hussains appeals, reducing their notional terms and substituting sentences of 5 years 3 months and 3 years 9 months, with Hussains notification period reduced to 10 years.