THE DUTCH AFRICAN TRADING COMPANY BV v. THE WEST AFRICAN MILLS COMPANY LTD
April 28, 2016
HIGH COURT
GHANA
CORAM
- SAMUEL K. A. ASIEDU
Areas of Law
- Alternative dispute resolution
- Civil Procedure
April 28, 2016
HIGH COURT
GHANA
CORAM
Try asking the following...
JUDGMENT
By an originating motion on notice filed on the 8th February, 2016, the applicant seeks the leave of the court to enforce the arbitral award of the Federation of Cocoa Commerce, London, United Kingdom dated the 7th September, 2015. According to the applicant the application is premised upon the inherent jurisdiction of the court.
The reasons for the application are detailed out in an accompanying affidavit. The respondent is opposed to the application as indicated in its affidavit in opposition. Upon the filing of the application, the court ordered counsel to file their written submissions which they did. The respondent has taken issue with the propriety of the application before the court.
The facts and the reasons for the application are captured in paragraphs 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 14, 17 and 18 of the supporting affidavit. According to the applicants:
“5. That by a claim submitted on 15th January 2014, the Applicant herein, the Claimant therein, a private limited liability company incorporated under the laws of The Netherlands, commenced arbitration proceedings against West African Mills Company Limited (WAMCO), a limited liability company incorporated under the laws of Ghana.
6. That the said Request for Arbitration was submitted to the Federation of Cocoa Commerce (FCC), in London, United Kingdom pursuant to an arbitration clause of the FCC Contract and Appeal Rules, which governed a number of contracts between the Parties, and subject to the Arbitration Act 1996 of England and Wales.
7. That the Applicant alleged that the West African Mills Company Limited, the Respondent herein, had breached the terms of the Agreement between the Parties.
8. That the Applicant claimed by the said Request for Arbitration, damages of GBP5, 701,695.88 and Euro 94,234.00.
9. That a hearing on Jurisdiction and Merits of the case took place in London, United Kingdom on 1st October 2014.
14. That on the 7th of September 2015, the Board of Appeal rendered its judgment in favour of the Applicant herein, Respondent therein and made the following orders:
i. The sum of GBP Sterling 2,048,770 (two million forty eight thousand and seven hundred and seventy British Pounds Sterling).
ii. Post Award interest calculated at one month LIBOR for Sterling + 2% per annum, from the date of default until the date of payment of this Award.
iii. The FCC and Arbitration fees under the Appeal calculated as GBP Sterling 4,585.00 (four thousand five hundred and eighty five Brit
AI Generated Summary
An originating motion was filed on 8 February 2016 by a Dutch private limited company seeking leave of the Ghana High Court to enforce a foreign arbitral award issued by the Federation of Cocoa Commerce (FCC) Board of Appeal in London on 7 September 2015 against West African Mills Company Limited (WAMCO). The respondent opposed, arguing non‑compliance with applicable rules. The judge held that the High Court does not possess inherent jurisdiction to enforce foreign arbitral awards and may act only under statute, specifically the Alternative Dispute Resolution Act, 2010 (Act 798). Section 57 authorizes enforcement by leave, and section 59 imposes mandatory prerequisites for foreign awards, including production of the authenticated original award, the arbitration agreement, proof of no pending appeal, and either reciprocity or New York Convention coverage. Although the applicant produced authenticated copies of the award and showed no pending appeal, it failed to exhibit the arbitration agreement and to prove a reciprocal enforcement arrangement with the United Kingdom. The court rejected reliance on a 1989 Ghana–UK bilateral investment treaty and noted L.I. 261 limits recognized foreign awards, with the UK not listed. Non‑compliance cannot be cured under Order 81. The application was dismissed.