Eskwai logo
Verify now as a student, judge or newly called lawyer for access to discounted plans.

REPUBLIC v. COMMISSIONER FOR CHIEFTAINCY AFFAIRS AND ANOTHER; EX PARTE NII ADJA KWAO II

April 13, 1981

COURT OF APPEAL

GHANA

CORAM

  • JIAGGE EDUSEI EDWARD WIREDU JJ.A

Areas of Law

  • Constitutional Law
  • Administrative Law
  • Civil Procedure
  • Property and Real Estate Law

AI Generated Summary

The Court of Appeal (per Jiagge J.A., with Edusei J.A. concurring and Edward Wiredu J.A. agreeing) reviewed an appeal from the High Court’s refusal to quash two ministerial actions affecting the James Town stool and its chief, Nii Adja Kwao II. The Commissioner responsible for Chieftaincy Affairs had issued Executive Instrument No. 85 (1974) directing custody of stool property, and later withdrew recognition of Nii Adja Kwao II in a Local Government Bulletin notice while the chief’s appeal to the National House of Chiefs was pending. The court held that although the minister possesses constitutional authority to revoke recognition instruments, the withdrawal violated Act 370 section 27’s stay-of-execution and Article 173’s due process constraints, and was therefore set aside. Conversely, section 29(1) expressly authorizes ordering “any person” to take possession of stool property affected by proceedings, rendering E.I. 85 proper. The appeal succeeded in part.