Eskwai logo
Verify now as a student, judge or newly called lawyer for access to discounted plans.

NATHANIEL ADJEIDU ARMAR v. MAVIS ADU and Others

April 17, 2024

SUPREME COURT

GHANA

CORAM

  • OWUSU (MS.) JSC (PRESIDING)
  • LOVEVELACE-JOHNSON (MS.) JSC
  • PROF. MENSA-BONSU (MRS.) JSC
  • ASIEDU JSC
  • KOOMSON JSC

Areas of Law

  • Property and Real Estate Law
  • Evidence Law
  • Civil Procedure

AI Generated Summary

The Supreme Court of Ghana, per Koomson JSC, affirmed the Court of Appeal’s reversal of the High Court in a land dispute at Dzorwulu, Accra. Both sides traced title to the Osu Stool: the Plaintiff through a 1969 indenture to Theophilus Quarcoo Armar and a 1999 transfer (Land Title Certificate No. GA 14159), and the 2nd and 3rd Defendants through a 1953 customary grant by Osu Mantse Nii Noi Dowuona IV, reflected in 1960/1962 instruments. The trial judge relied on a court-appointed surveyor’s (CW1) composite plan to find the lands the same, but the Court of Appeal found them different. Applying High Court Rules Order 26 and Evidence Act sections 112 and 67, the Supreme Court held PW1’s expert evidence was admissible and CW1’s report dubious. After ordering a fresh composite plan (Exhibit CE1/SC) based on original registered site plans, the Court found Plaintiff’s land overlapped by 38% due to a changed layout and existing road, while Defendants’ land lay about 2000 feet away, confirming distinct parcels. The appeal was dismissed; the Court of Appeal’s judgment and dismissal of the counterclaim were affirmed.

JUDGMENT