KWAWUVI AGBONUTSI VS WILLIAM KWAKU AGOZIE
2024
COURT OF APPEAL
GHANA
CORAM
- SENYO DZAMEFE. JA (PRESIDING)
- GIFTY AGYEI ADDO JA
- CHRISTOPHER ARCHER JA
Areas of Law
- Civil Procedure
- Evidence Law
- Property and Real Estate Law
2024
COURT OF APPEAL
GHANA
CORAM
AI Generated Summary
In this interlocutory appeal, the Defendant challenged a High Court ruling that he was not a bona fide purchaser for value without notice of defect in the title of disputed land. The Plaintiff, representing the Dakpui family, asserted title and sought legal redress for trespass and related reliefs. The Defendant counterclaimed and sought joinder of additional parties, which was denied by the trial court. The appellate court found the trial judge erred by addressing substantive issues in the interlocutory stage, emphasizing that such matters should be resolved at a full trial. The appeal was allowed, with portions of the original ruling set aside as legally unsound.
GIFTY AGYEI ADDO JA
INTRODUCTION
This is an interlocutory appeal by the Defendant/Appellant against the ruling of the High Court, Sogakope. The ruling is dated 27th of September 2022. The appeal calls on us to set aside portions of the ruling on the joinder application, which held that the Defendant/Appellant was not a bona fide purchaser for value of the subject of dispute without notice of defect in the title of his grantor. For ease of reference, we shall maintain the designation of the parties in the court below, that is, the Plaintiff and Defendant.
BACKGROUND AND FACTS
The Plaintiff, per his amended writ of summons and accompanying statement of claim, filed on 4th July 2022, brought an action against the Defendant seeking the following reliefs:
a. Declaration of title to all that piece or parcel of land situate, lying and being at Kewikpo and bounded as follows;
On the North by Adzidokpoe Creek and marked as Dakpui family land,
On the South by Atorkpo and marked as Dakpui family land,
On the East by Wevoe Creek and marked as Dakpui family land,
On the West by Aflave Creek and marked as Dakpui family land.
b. Damages for trespass.
c. Recovery of possession.
d. An order for perpetual injunction restraining the Defendant, his privies, assigns, agents, workmen or servants from entering, ploughing, cultivating, developing, dealing with the disputed land and or engaging in any act (s) that amount to interference with the property right of the plaintiff’s Dakpui family.
e. Cost including legal fees.
THE CASE OF THE PLAINTIFF
The action was mounted by the Plaintiff, according to him, as the head and acting representative of the Dakpui family of Mafi-Lokokope. Per the Plaintiff, his family owns a large tract of land measuring in total 87, 667.67 acres, on which his family has exercised various overt acts of ownership, such as farming, for many years without any interference from any quarter. That the ownership of the said land by his family has been affirmed by a decision of the High Court dated 23rd August 2021 in suit no E1/24/2021 entitled HLORTATOR KWAKU DZORGBELA AND OTHERS VRS: KWAWUVI AGBONUTSI AND ANOTHER.
The Plaintiff continues that the Defendant has trespassed on portions of the said tract of land, which trespass is located at Kewikpo. Per the Plaintiff, all efforts to stop the Defendant’s activities of trespass have proved futile. It is for this reason that the Plaintiff instituted the action.
THE CASE OF THE DEFENDANT
The Defend