Eskwai logo
Verify now as a student, judge or newly called lawyer for access to discounted plans.

IN RE OPOKU (DECD.); GOH v. DONYINAH AND OTHERS

December 18, 1972

COURT OF APPEAL

Areas of Law

  • Probate and Succession
  • Evidence Law

AI Generated Summary

Archer J.A., delivering the Court of Appeal’s decision, reversed a High Court ruling that had invalidated the will of Samuel Opoku because its contents were expressed in indirect speech. After the High Court in Accra granted probate to three executors named in the will, the respondent, claiming to be the customary successor, sought revocation alleging non-compliance with the Wills Act 1837 and fraud or undue influence. Evidence showed that Opoku, recuperating at Agogo hospital, produced a paper from under his pillow, dictated his wishes to the third appellant, read the document, and signed; both witnesses then attested. The court held that direct speech is not legally required, that the Wills Act’s formalities were satisfied, and that there was no proof of fraud or undue influence. Citing Milnes v. Foder and Guardhouse v. Blackburn, the court emphasized testamentary intent, knowledge and approval, and the sufficiency of formal execution, and allowed the appeal to preserve the testator’s solemn wishes.

JUDGMENT