Eskwai logo
Verify now as a student, judge or newly called lawyer for access to discounted plans.

ADDO v. NARTEY

July 3, 1972

COURT OF APPEAL

CORAM

  • APALOO
  • BENTSI-ENCHILL JJ.S.C.
  • SOWAH J.A

Areas of Law

  • Contract Law
  • Equity and Trusts
  • Property and Real Estate Law

AI Generated Summary

Rev. J. E. Addo owned house No. 98/5 Fanofa, Accra, on land vested in the Akwapim Union, which had promised him a lease. In 1957–1958, Addo agreed to sell the property to Nyemimei Akpee Enterprises for £G2,000, received £G1,000, and authorized the defendants to collect rents, promising to execute a transfer within one month and receive the balance upon execution. After Addo failed to transfer, he proposed to redeem by refunding £G1,000 but did not do so. The High Court treated defendants as trustees and found a “new contract.” On appeal, Apaloo J.S.C. held there was no substituted contract; the January 1958 agreement remained controlling, and defendants were not trustees but authorized to collect rents. The Court rejected an implied one‑month payment term, noted part‑performance could secure a lease from Akwapim Union, and, relying on Mortlock v. Buller, recognized defendants’ right to accept a lesser leasehold interest. The appeal was allowed and the High Court reversed.

JUDGMENT