JUDGMENT
1 Plaintiff’s case
Per his amended writ of summons and statement of claim1
, Plaintiff’s suit against
the Defendants jointly and severally is for:
(i) Damages for trespass.
(ii) Perpetual injunction restraining the Defendants, their assigns,
workmen and servants from entering the said lands until the final
determination of the matter.
(iii) Declaration of Title to the said lands.
(iv) Cost of the suit.
Plaintiff claims to be the head of the Zilevu family of Zilevukorpe near Tadzevu,
and that he and his siblings are the third-generation of their grandfather Togbui
Kugbago who he claims first settled on a 60-acre parcel of land that was granted
to him (Togbui Kugbago) customarily by Togbui Bani I of Devego. The land in
question, the plaintiff claims, is bounded by the Sovisie family on the east, the
Dakpo family on the west; the Gli Agbowada family on the South; and the Sovisie
family on the North. According to Plaintiff, the 1
st and 2nd Defendants' family
settled at Devego-Tadzevu, a distance of two kilometres away from Zilevukope,
and so does not share boundary with Zilevukope where Plaintiff’s family settled.
The 1
st and 2nd Defendants are of the Sabblah family of Devego near Tadzevu,
whilst the 3
rd Defendant is one of the sons of the late Prophet CKN Wovenu, the
founder of the Apostles Revelation Society Church (ARS). Plaintiff claims that it is
the late CKN Wovenu who was using his influence to claim that the Defendants’
Sabblah family has alienated the land to him despite the plaintiff’s family protests
and warnings. Evident by Exhibit A, Plaintiff claims to have confronted the
Sabblah family of CKN Wovenu’s claims to have purchased the land. Plaintiff
claims further that the Sabblah family denied any such alienation of land to CKN
Wovenu; claiming further to have met with CKN Wovenu who appealed to the
plaintiff’s family to alienate some of the plaintiff’s family lands to him, as his
Church was expanding and wanted lands to develop into dwelling places for
members.
Plaintiff claims that his family together with their grantors invited CKN Wovenu
and the Sabblah family for a discussion over Wovenu’s request, but the latter failed
to avail themselves of the opportunity. Plaintiff’s case is that CKN Wovenu’s
encroachment onto their family land stopped on his death in 1998, but it was
revived around 2004/5 when Defendants started encroaching on the lands and had
not since abated despite plaintiff’s warnin